In this case, you may want to purchase the commercial version, I believe, or spin up S3-based object storage like Ceph Opens a new window or Minio Opens a new window to trick the software into thinking it is still uploading to the cloud -) Let's assume you have some sort of archival storage and would like to save those virtual tales locally. It is just a matter of correct schedule and automation to forget about that limitation completely. Johnsonny wrote:In your experience, have you found the 4-tape limitation to be a hindrance? Or how have you accommodated that limitation?Īs long as you treat those four tapes as a temporary cache required only during the period needed to upload those tapes into the cloud, you are totally fine with the limitations. It is capable of utilizing all the bandwidth you can get to Backblaze and requires additional QoS settings to avoid interference with other WAN-related services and regular internet usage.Īlternatively, you can use rclone Opens a new window, which can run on Synology just well Opens a new window and does a better job compared to native Hyper Backup. We are using the free Backblaze storage gateway for Veeam Opens a new window, which is virtual tapes based and runs alongside the primary Veeam B&R server. Some say that is a benefit since the upload process does not consume too much WAN bandwidth leaving enough throughput for other things. Since backup to the cloud is mainly used for archiving/DR purposes, most people don't care how long it takes to upload the backups. Johnsonny wrote:After a month+ long dialogue with Synology support, they have acknowledged (to some degree) that our experience of slow upload speeds is a limitation of their software and something that might get fixed in some future update. I also don't know any long-term problems with using 8MB vs 512MB multipart size, so if there's any counsel available regarding that, I'd appreciate it too. Decreasing the multipart size helps, but it's still only half of what I know our environment can handle. At the smallest size (8MB), we're getting 40Mb/s (5MB/s) upload speeds, but as the Multipart size increases to the default 512MB, the speed decreases to 16Mb/s.Īfter a month+ long dialogue with Synology support, they have acknowledged (to some degree) that our experience of slow upload speeds is a limitation of their software and something that might get fixed in some future update.Īs a sort of last-ditch effort, I'm wondering if anyone else here has experience with slow upload speeds with Hyper Backup and perhaps a way of speeding it up. What's strange is that as we decrease the 'multipart upload part size' the actual upload speeds increase. This is a far cry from the 80Mb/s (10MB/s) we get from Backblazes' web-based speedtest tool or from other tools leveraging their APIs. Unboxed the units, configured them, got some data on there, and tried a test upload to Backblaze and got a paltry 16Mb/s (2MB/s) speeds. just seems like they are a new artifact on my DS.We bought a couple of Synology RS1221RP+ units to function mainly as JBoD with the intention of backing them up to Backblaze using Synology Hyper Backup. my new DS folders are full of the MODD files from my Sony RX100 camera, I don't remember seeing those on my MSS? I understand their definition. I am using a Netgear GB switch, pc (windows) and DS both show network as 1GB. from 5kb up to 20mb? Is this transfer speed normal? The file station graph (and mouse over on upload icon) jumps around a lot. Still a long time? looks like I am running about 1mb/sec with that estimate. that helped dramatically, now estimate for remaining 810GB is 9days/15 hours. I found one thread here that recommended the better SMB settings, and turning off transport encryption. Did drag and drop, File station was estimating 58 days to complete. My first action was to restore my photos (921GB). I am now beginning to restore my files from my PC HDD's to the DS418. Background - Purchased DS418, added 4 2TB seagate IW NAS ST2000VN004 drives. Thanx for listening, love this brain trust. I have searched this site for answers but have not found a full answer yet. Hi folks, new Synology (and this forum) user, finally gave up on HP MSS and WHS V1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |